Shoemaker v. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Educ.

87 F.3d 1322 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION; Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine; David Wagner; Glenna L. Case; John C. Gienapp, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 6, 1996. Decided June 19, 1996. 1 Before: BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Dr. William Shoemaker appeals the district court's dismissal, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), of his complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985(3), and 1986 and seeking declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 , against the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), its Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine (RRC), and several of its members. 1 We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 4 * Shoemaker argues that…