United States v. Santana Samuel Gonzalez-Casillas

87 F.3d 1323 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santana Samuel GONZALEZ-CASILLAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30268. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Santana Samuel Gonzalez-Casillas appeals his conviction following the entry of his conditional guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and illegal re-entry subsequent to an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) and (b)(2). Gonzalez-Casillas contends that the district court erred by denying his suppression motion because the police detective's affidavit did not establish probable cause to search his apartment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. Background 3 On April 20, 1994, Detective Roy Skinner requested a warrant to…