United States v. Todd Michael Arney

Good Law
87 F.3d 1323·1996 WL 335365·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31534
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 199695-30090California644 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1323 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Todd Michael ARNEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30090. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1996. * Decided June 17, 1996. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Todd Michael Arney appeals his conviction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g) for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The defendant contends that: (1) the district court abused its discretion by admitting a federal agent's opinion testimony to impeach the credibility of a key defense witness; and (2) the admission of the opinion testimony was not harmless error because it deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm. DISCUSSION 3 Defendant argues that Agent Heller's testimony, which impeached the credibility of defense witness Ms. Dewan, was impermissible opinion evidence. See Fed.R.Evid. 608. The government argues this testimony was merely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.