United States v. Richard Donald Chambers, United States of America v. Richard Donald Chambers

87 F.3d 1323 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Donald CHAMBERS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Donald CHAMBERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-55857. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 5, 1996. Decided June 17, 1996. Before: FARRIS, FERNANDEZ, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Richard D. Chambers ("Chambers") appeals the denial of two separate habeas petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , challenging his 1986 and 1991 convictions for receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(2). We affirm. 3 In 1986, the Government filed a two-count information ("the 1986 information") against Chambers, alleging that he received child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(2). Both counts tracked the language of § 2252(a)(2) which, in pertinent part, makes it unlawful for…