United States v. Steven Hilt

87 F.3d 1324 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven HILT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30235. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 8, 1996. * Decided June 4, 1996. Before: LAY, ** CHOY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Steven Hilt appeals his conviction for one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , one count of conspiracy to launder money in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 , four substantive money laundering counts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 , and one count of using a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). Hilt argues that sufficient evidence does not support any of his convictions. Hilt withdraws his double jeopardy argument in his reply brief. We affirm. Analysis 3 I. Sufficient evidence supports Hilt's conspiracy and money laundering convictions. 4…