United States v. Jonathan Paries, United States of America v. Romal Daron Hunter, Aka: Romal Hunter

87 F.3d 1324 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan PARIES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Romal Daron HUNTER, aka: Romal Hunter, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-50246, 95-50313. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1996. Decided June 5, 1996. Before: GIBSON * , JOHN T. NOONAN, JR., and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jonathan Paries and Romal Hunter were tried jointly and now appeal their respective convictions on the same three charges: conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 371 , 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a)(d); aiding and abetting armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 (a), 2113(a), (d); and aiding and abetting the use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1), 924(d), 2(a). We AFFIRM their convictions. BACKGROUND 3 Around 2:00 p.m. on November 8, 1994, three men…