United States v. Anthony Cortez Jackson

Good Law
87 F.3d 1324·1996 WL 329787·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 199695-35943California392 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1324 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Cortez JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-35943. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 14, 1996. Before: CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, JR. and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Anthony Jackson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of its denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, correct or set aside his sentence for possession of cocaine base. 1 3 "An appeal from a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion brings up only the denial of the motion for review, not the merits of the underlying judgment." Molloy v. Wilson, 878 F.2d 313, 315 (9th Cir.1989). We therefore confine our review to the district court's denial of Jackson's Rule 60(b) motion, which we review for abuse of discretion. Id. In his motion for reconsideration, Jackson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.