United States v. Lissette Christina Nukida

87 F.3d 1324 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lissette Christina NUKIDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50295. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 19, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Lissette Christina Nukida appeals her sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following her guilty plea conviction for five counts of tampering with consumer products in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1365 (a)(3) and 1365(a)(4). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. Nukida contends that the district court erred by refusing to grant her a reduction in offense level for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Nukida does not contest the enhancement of her sentence for obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 based on her flight to Mexico while released on bail. 1 "…