United States v. Marcelina Maldonado-Enriquez

87 F.3d 1324 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelina MALDONADO-ENRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50122. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 9, 1996. * Decided June 5, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and TRIMBLE. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Pursuant to a Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(1)(B) plea agreement, Marcelina Maldonado-Enriquez pleaded guilty to charges of possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Although the district court failed to warn Maldonando-Enriquez that she would be bound by her guilty plea even if the court later chose to reject the terms of her plea agreement, see Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(2), the court did not reject the agreement and Maldonado-Enriquez did not object to the court's omission. Maldonado-Enriquez filed timely notices of appeal from both her…