United States v. Patrick Kent Morris

87 F.3d 1324 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Kent MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10308. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1996. * Decided June 20, 1996. Before: NORRIS, T.G. NELSON and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Patrick Kent Morris appeals the sentence imposed under the sentencing guidelines following the district court's revocation of his four-year period of supervised release. 3 The district court found, and there is ample evidence to support the finding, that Morris had violated his period of supervised release by incurring a new arrest, failing to participate in drug and alcohol treatment, and testing positive for use of a controlled substance. 4 The Chapter Seven policy statement is not binding on the court. United States v. Forrester, 19 F.3d 482, 484 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. Plunkett, 74 F.3d 938 (9th Cir.1996). The district judge…