United States v. Fred Robbin, AKA Farid Robin Abuseraj

87 F.3d 1325 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred ROBBIN, aka Farid Robin Abuseraj, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50501. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 5, 1996. * Decided June 07, 1996. Before: WIGGINS, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Fred Robbin was convicted of two counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 ; two counts of interstate transportation of stolen property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 ; and one count of bail jumping, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146 . He appeals his sentence for the wire fraud and transportation of stolen property counts. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. FACTS 3 In January 1987, a jury found Robbin guilty of two counts of wire fraud and two counts of interstate transportation. The counts related to Robbin's management of a car…