United States v. Reed Winslow

87 F.3d 1325 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reed WINSLOW, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 9, 1996. Decided June 19, 1996. 1 Before: PREGERSON and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 A jury convicted appellant Reed Winslow ("Winslow") of distribution of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C). On his first appeal, Winslow contended, inter alia, that the prosecution's failure to provide him with the entirety of a videotape made during the "sting" operation in this case violated Brady v. Maryland, 372 U.S. 83 , 87 (1963). A panel of this court affirmed the conviction on all other issues but remanded the case to the district court to conduct a Brady hearing and to consider the issue of cumulative error. United States…