United States v. Joseph Alex Wilson, United States of America v. Diahann Bischoff

87 F.3d 1325 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Alex WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diahann BISCHOFF, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-30261, 95-30267. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1996. Decided June 5, 1996. Before: LAY, * CHOY and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 These appeals present two fundamental issues. The first issue is whether the government violated its plea agreement with Joseph Alex Wilson by recommending that he be given a five-level enhancement for use of a firearm pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(C), and whether the district court erred by so enhancing his sentence. The second issue involves both Wilson and his fiancee, co-defendant Diahann Bischoff, who assert that the district court acted unreasonably in imposing a mutual "no contact" restriction upon them as a condition of their…