United States v. Oscar Ruiz Sifuentez

87 F.3d 1325 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Ruiz SIFUENTEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-35146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 12, 1996. * Decided June 14, 1996. Before: CANBY, JOHN T. NOONAN, JR., and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oscar Ruiz Sifuentez appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Sifuentez contends that the district court failed to comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 at his plea hearing, his counsel was ineffective for failing to prosecute his direct criminal appeal, and that he was denied his right to collaterally attack a prior conviction that was used to enhance his sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo the denial of a section 2255 motion, Frazer v. United States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 1 3 * Rule 11 4 Sifuentez contends that the district court violated Rule 11 by…