United States v. Zoel Rivera-Flores

Good Law
87 F.3d 1325·1996 WL 337070·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31599
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 199695-50543California351 words

Opinion

Opinion

87 F.3d 1325 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zoel RIVERA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50543. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1996. * Decided June 18, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Zoel Rivera-Flores appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea conviction for importation of cocaine. Rivera-Flores contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for a downward departure in sentence on the ground that this was a single act of aberrant behavior. We have jurisdiction to review the district court's refusal to depart downward only if the court concluded that it did not have the discretion to depart. United States v. Cantu, 12 F.3d 1506, 1510 (9th Cir.1993). Aberrant behavior is a permissible basis for departure. United States v. Takai, 941 F.2d 738, 743 (9th Cir.1991). 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.