Thomas

Thomas v. Massanari

Good Law
25 F. App'x 510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 2001No. 00-35615. D.C. No. CV-99-06219-MRHCalifornia848 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Henry Thomas appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Social Security Administration Commissioner’s (Commissioner) denial of his application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Thomas applied for benefits alleging disability due to head and back injuries. His application was denied by the Commissioner and again denied following a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ). The ALJ’s decision became final when Thomas’ request for administrative review was denied. The district court affirmed the ALJ’s decision. Thomas filed a timely appeal.

In her decision, the ALJ found that although Thomas suffered from severe impairments, he was not precluded from performing a limited number of sedentary jobs. Utilizing a vocational expert, the ALJ identified a significant number of those jobs. The ALJ also found Thomas’ testimony not credible and discounted the opinions of a treating physician and an examining physician.

Thomas attributes a number of errors to the ALJ. Central to all of Thomas’ contentions is whether the ALJ erred by finding Thomas not credible and thus improperly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.