Torres-Lopez

United States v. Torres-Lopez

Good Law
26 F. App'x 758
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 1, 2002No. 00-50739; D.C. No. CR-00-02008-TJWCalifornia334 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

AMENDED ORDER

The court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and that the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The order filed on January 11, 2002 is vacated. This case shall be submitted on the briefs and record, without oral argument, on January 30, 2002, in Pasadena, California.

MEMORANDUM **

Ricardo Torres-Lopez (“Torres”) appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with attempted reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . The indictment was dismissed by the government after Torres entered a conditional guilty plea to a superseding information charging him with illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we reverse and remand.

Torres’ appeal is not mooted by the government’s dismissal of the indictment after Torres entered his conditional guilty plea. See United States v. Scott, 884 F.2d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir.1989) (per curiam).

Torres contends that his indictment is defective because it fails to allege specific intent. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.