Torres-Lopez
United States v. Torres-Lopez
Opinion
Lead Opinion
AMENDED ORDER
The court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and that the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The order filed on January 11, 2002 is vacated. This case shall be submitted on the briefs and record, without oral argument, on January 30, 2002, in Pasadena, California.
MEMORANDUM **
Ricardo Torres-Lopez (“Torres”) appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with attempted reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . The indictment was dismissed by the government after Torres entered a conditional guilty plea to a superseding information charging him with illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we reverse and remand.
Torres’ appeal is not mooted by the government’s dismissal of the indictment after Torres entered his conditional guilty plea. See United States v. Scott, 884 F.2d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir.1989) (per curiam).
Torres contends that his indictment is defective because it fails to allege specific intent. We…