Beesley

MEMORANDUM *

Harold Beesley appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the federal defendants and the individual defendants on each of his claims.

We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm.

On appeal, Beesley challenges the district court’s entry of judgment against him with respect to, (1) his Bivens 1 claim alleging that defendants United States, United States Department of Justice, Ramon, and Grotewold (collectively “all named defendants”) violated his Fifth Amendment due process rights, (2) his Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706 , claim against the United States Department of Justice and Ramon in his official capacity as United States Marshal for the Central District of California, (3) his Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112 et seq., claim against all named defendants, (4) his claim of wrongful termination in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Gov.Code § 12900 et seq., against all named defendants, and (5) his Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 , claim…