Laoura Ivanovna TEDEEVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent

Good Law
88 F.3d 826·96 Daily Journal DAR 8295·1996 WL 383098·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14191·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5138
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 199695-70145California679 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beezer, J.

ORDER

Respondent’s request for publication is granted. The Memorandum Disposition filed May 28, 1996, is redesignated, with modifications, as an authored Opinion by Judge BEEZER.

OPINION

We consider when notice of a deportation hearing must be given in person to an alien before the alien can be deported in absentia.

Laoura Tedeeva (“Petitioner”) was ordered deported in absentia when she failed to appear for a hearing. Petitioner contends that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) did not give her notice of the hearing “in person” or establish by “clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence” that personal service was not practicable.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a, and we deny the petition for review.

I

Petitioner is a native of Russia who arrived for a visit in the United States on September 4, 1992. On January 31, 1994, the INS denied Petitioner’s application for asylum and issued an order to show cause initiating deportation proceedings against her. The order advised Petitioner that she would be notified later of the time and place of her deportation proceeding.

On March 22,1994, the Office of the Immigration Judge sent Petitioner a notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.