Suarez-Rocha

United States v. Suarez-Rocha

Good Law
27 F. App'x 812
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 2001No. 01-10207; D.C. No. CR-00-00290-HDM/RJJCalifornia220 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Eduardo Suarez-Rocha appeals the 64-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry of a deported alien after conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Suarez-Rocha contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) based upon a prior felony which was not pled in the indictment, to which he did not admit at his change of plea hearing, and which was not submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Suarez-Rocha is correct that this court has specifically rejected the contention that Apprendi has overruled Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). Sua *813 rez-Rocha’s arguments are foreclosed under United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 966 , 121 S.Ct. 1503 , 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001).

.AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.