Akhter

United States v. Akhter

Good Law
29 F. App'x 484
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 2002No. 01-50349; D.C. No. CR-00-01001-MLRCalifornia373 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rabiya Akhter appeals her 16-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea conviction for harboring an illegal alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We affirm.

Akhter contends that the district court erred when it applied the two level “vulnerable victim” enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1(b)(1), to her base offense level because: (1) there is no evidence that her victim was more vulnerable than the usual victims of the offense; and (2) the factor making her victim vulnerable, namely alienage, was a necessary prerequisite to the commission of harboring an illegal alien. We disagree.

We review de novo a district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines and its finding of victim vulnerability for clear error. See United States v. Castaneda, 239 F.3d 978, 980 (9th Cir.2001).

The record shows that the victim in this case was found to be “particularly susceptible to the criminal conduct” based on the surrounding circumstances of the crime, in addition to several of the victim’s particular characteristics. See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.1(b)(1) comment, (n. 2) (stating a vulnerable victim is one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.