45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 245, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5143, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,031, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8275 United States of America v. Morreon B. Rude, United States of America v. Stafford Y.L. Mew, United States of America v. Charles E. Andrews, United States of America v. Rodney H.S. Kim

Good Law
88 F.3d 1538
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 199695-30198California8,726 words

Opinion

Opinion

88 F.3d 1538 45 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 245 , 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5143, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11 ,031, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8275 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Morreon B. RUDE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stafford Y.L. MEW, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles E. ANDREWS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney H.S. KIM, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-30198, 95-30205, 95-30207 and 95-30208. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1996. Decided July 10, 1996. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Sept. 10, 1996. * Charles A. Johnston, Felker, Lazares & Johnston, Tacoma, Washington, for defendant-appellant Rude. Ronald G.S. Au, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellant Mew. Stephen E. Robinson, Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, Wichita, Kansas, for defendant-appellant Andrews. Ronald D. Ness, Port Orchard, Washington, for defendant-appellant Kim. Robert M. Westinghouse and Carl Blackstone, Assistant United States Attorneys, Seattle, Washington, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeals from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.