Marquez-Centeno

United States v. Marquez-Centeno

Good Law
31 F. App'x 365
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 2002No. 00-10575; D.C. No. CR-00-00635-SMMCalifornia222 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant Jose Luis Marquez-Centeno appeals his sentence for re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). The district court held that Marquez-Centeno’s two prior convictions under Arizona law for drug possession were “aggravated felonies” warranting a 16-level sentencing enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) of the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) (2000). We review de novo the district court’s conclusion that Marquez-Centeno’s prior convictions are aggravated felonies triggering the enhancement. United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905, 907 (9th Cir.2001).

Because the sentences for MarquezCenteno’s prior state convictions were governed by Arizona’s Proposition 200, this case is controlled by our decision in United States v. Robles-Rodriguez, 281 F.3d 900 (9th Cir.2002). For the reasons stated in Robles-Rodriguez , we hold that Marquez-Centeno’s Arizona drug possession convictions are not “aggravated felonies” under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) of the Sentencing Guidelines. We also hold that, under Robles-Rodriguez , Marquez-Centeno’s prior convictions do not fall into the category of “other felonies” warranting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.