Rekhter
Rekhter v. Central Park East Ltd. Partnership
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM ***
Ms. Rekhter, pro se, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (2000). Ms. Rekhter has not raised a genuine issue of fact whether the defendants discriminated against her on the basis of any protected status, 1 nor has she raised a genuine issue whether the defendants’ policy had a significantly adverse or disproportionate impact on persons of a particular group. 2 Summary judgment was proper. 3
AFFIRMED.
jjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. See Harris v. Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043, 1051 (9th Cir. 1999).
. See Pfaff v. United States Department of Housing, 88 F.3d 739, 745 (9th Cir. 1996).
. See Harris, 183 F.3d at 1051 .