Camarena-Rodriguez

United States v. Camarena-Rodriguez

Good Law
31 F. App'x 540
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 2002No. 01-10022; D.C. No. CR-99-00575-FRZCalifornia255 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Vicente Manuel Camarena-Rodriguez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and 60-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) & (b)(i)(A)(ii) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Camarena-Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Counsel has identified and correctly rejected as a potential issue for appeal whether the district court erred by denying Camarena-Rodriguez’s request for a cultural assimilation downward departure. A district court’s discretionary decision to deny a downward departure request is unreviewable on appeal. United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726, 729, 731-32 (9th Cir.1997). Camarena-Rodriguez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.