Kashani

Allen Matkins Leck & Malory LLP v. Kashani

Good Law
32 F. App'x 248
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 2002No. 00-56919; D.C. No. CV-00-00122-NAJCalifornia852 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Allen, Matkins, Leek, Gamble & Mallory, LLP (“Allen Matkins”) appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s modification of an award of sanctions following a prior appeal to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”). We review decisions of the BAP and the district court de novo. Vanderpark Props., *249 Inc. v. Buchbinder (In re Windmill Farms, Inc.), 841 F.2d 1467, 1469 (9th Cir.1988); Harmon v. Korbrin (In re Harmon), 250 F.3d 1240, 1245 (9th Cir.2001). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 158 (d) and 1291, and we reverse.

The bankruptcy court’s September 6, 1996 Memorandum Decision and the BAP’s February 4, 1998 decision are properly before this court for appellate review. 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d) (“The courts of appeals shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions, judgments, orders, and decrees [issued by the BAP and district courts in bankruptcy cases].)”; cf. Stanley v. Crossland, Crossland, Chambers, MacArthur & Lastreto (In re Lakeshore Village Resort, Ltd.), 81 F.3d 103, 107-08 (9th Cir.1996); see also Woods v. Kenan (In re Woods), 173 F.3d 770, 774-76 (10th Cir.1999) (accepting jurisdiction under similar procedural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.