41 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 76,978, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5244, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8478 Vulcan Power Company v. Bonneville Power Administration, California Energy Company, Inc. C.E. Newberry, Inc., Respondents-Intervenors

Good Law
89 F.3d 549
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 199694-70748California949 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 549 41 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 76,978 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5244, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8478 VULCAN POWER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Respondent, California Energy Company, Inc.; C.E. Newberry, Inc., Respondents-Intervenors. No. 94-70748. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1996. * Memorandum Feb. 26, 1996. Decided July 16, 1996. Joseph B. Richards, Luvaas, Cobb, Richards & Fraser, Eugene, Oregon, for petitioner Vulcan Power Company. Harvard P. Spigal, Preston Michie and Joyce E. Patton, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon; Thomas C. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for respondent Bonneville Power Administration. Stephen L. Griffith and William H. Holmes, Stoel, Rives, Boley, Jones & Grey, Portland, Oregon, for respondents-intervenors California Energy and C.E. Newberry. Petition for Review of a Decision of the Bonneville Power Administration. Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Vulcan Power Company, an unsuccessful bidder for a federal Geothermal Pilot Project at the Newberry Crater in Oregon (the "Project"), appeals two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.