STANFORD RANCH, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Good Law
89 F.3d 618·96 Daily Journal DAR 8427·1996 WL 391774·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17317·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5212
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 199695-15549California5,274 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Stanford Ranch, Inc., (“Stanford”) brought suit against Maryland Casualty Company and Northern Insurance Company of New York (collectively “Maryland”) claiming breach of insurance contracts and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment, and the district court granted the motion in favor of Maryland and denied the motion of Stanford. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. The Underlying Lawsuits

Stanford is a developer of a master-planned community in Rocklin, California. Stanford, acting as master developer, subdivides the development and sells large tracts of land to other developers (“sub-developers”) for separate development. Three such sub-developers, Prudential Development Company, Centex Real Estate Corporation and Covington Homes, Northern California (collectively “claimants”), filed actions in state court against Stanford (“underlying lawsuits”). All three underlying lawsuits allege actions for specific performance, breach of contract, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and nondisclosure.

1. Prudential…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.