Walnut Creek Honda Associates 2, Inc., Dba Walnut Creek Honda v. National Labor Relations Board, Automotive MacHinists Lodge No. 1173 Teamsters Union Local No. 315, Respondent-Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Walnut Creek Honda Associates 2, Inc., Dba Walnut Creek Honda

Good Law
89 F.3d 645·96 Daily Journal DAR 8475·152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2847·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17425·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5245
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 199695-70278California2,659 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 645 152 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2847 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5245, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8475 WALNUT CREEK HONDA ASSOCIATES 2, INC., dba Walnut Creek Honda, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Automotive Machinists Lodge No. 1173 Teamsters Union Local No. 315, Respondent-Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. WALNUT CREEK HONDA ASSOCIATES 2, INC., dba Walnut Creek Honda, Respondent. Nos. 95-70278, 95-70343. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1996. Decided July 16, 1996. 1 Beth E. Aspedon and Philip E. Drysdale, Fitzgerald, Abbott & Beardsley, Oakland, California, for the petitioner--cross-respondent. 2 David A. Rosenfeld, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Oakland, California, for the respondent-intervenor. 3 Charles Donnelly and Joseph J. Jablonski, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the respondent--cross-petitioner. 4 Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 32-CA-12783. 5 Before: PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and WINMILL, District Judge. * 6 WINMILL, District Judge.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.