Steven Charles Brigida, Aka: Steven C. Brigida v. Otis Thurman, Warden, California State Department of Corrections D.B. Anderson Tagnipez Selle

89 F.3d 844 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven Charles BRIGIDA, aka: Steven C. Brigida, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Otis THURMAN, Warden, California State Department of Corrections; D.B. Anderson; Tagnipez; Selle, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-56472. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Steven Charles Brigida appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to obey court orders requiring him to file an amended complaint. We review for abuse of discretion the district court's dismissal for failure to prosecute. Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440 (9th Cir.1988). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 3 The district court dismissed Brigida's First Amended complaint with leave to amend because it determined that…