Juan A. Contreras v. United States

Good Law
89 F.3d 844·1996 WL 225768·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34961
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 3, 199695-55601California752 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 844 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Juan A. CONTRERAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-55601. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 3, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Juan Contreras appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Contreras filed this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b) and 2671-2680 (1989), for injuries suffered when Contreras was struck by a vehicle after Border Patrol agents confiscated his vehicle and allegedly forced him to walk to the nearest town. We review de novo the dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.