Neal Andrew Carr v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

89 F.3d 844 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Neal Andrew CARR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70373. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1996. Decided June 25, 1996. 1 Before: WALLACE and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BROWNING, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Carr petitions us to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board), holding him deportable under section 241(a)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(2)(C). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a. We rejected his due process claim in denying his petition in an opinion. We dispose of Carr's remaining issues in this disposition. 3 As stated in our accompanying opinion, we review the Board's determination of questions of law de novo, but we give deference to the Board's interpretation of the Act. 4 Carr asserts several constitutional challenges…