Maria Filomena Cardoza-Arauz, A.K.A. Maria Filomena Arauz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
89 F.3d 844·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34956
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 199694-70919California1,490 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 844 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Maria Filomena CARDOZA-ARAUZ, a.k.a. Maria Filomena Arauz, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70919. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1996. * Decided June 10, 1996. Before: WIGGINS, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Maria Filomena Cardoza-Arauz (Cardoza) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. The BIA determined that Cardoza did not demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution or past persecution sufficient to warrant relief. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a, and we deny Cardoza's petition for review. FACTS 3 Cardoza, a native of Nicaragua, entered the United States in October 1989. In June 1990, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) issued an order to show cause, which alleged Cardoza was subject to deportation for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.