Matthew Lee Bolar v. Tana Wood Chase Riveland Tom Rolfs

89 F.3d 844 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Matthew Lee BOLAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD; Chase Riveland; Tom Rolfs, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35782. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 7, 1996. * Decided July 9, 1996. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Matthew Bolar appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint against various prison employees. Bolar's complaint was dismissed without prejudice after he failed to comply with the district court's order requiring him to file an amended complaint to correct deficiencies identified by the court. Although Bolar did submit an amended complaint, the court found that it was not timely and did not cure the deficiencies. The court stated in its dismissal order that Bolar "is free to file an entirely new complaint which sets forth facts, clearly and precisely, demonstrating that identified defendants violated his due…