Raul Aguirre-Moreno v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
89 F.3d 844·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34955
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 199694-70924California1,588 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 844 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raul AGUIRRE-MORENO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70924. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 15, 1996. Decided June 24, 1996. 1 Before: T.G. NELSON, TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Raul Aguirre-Moreno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). An immigration judge (IJ) had ruled that Aguirre-Moreno was not deportable. The BIA reversed the IJ. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition. 4 In 1982, Aguirre-Moreno was convicted in Nevada of battery with the intent to commit sexual assault. On March 30, 1984, he applied for an immigrant visa at the United States Embassy in Mexico City. The application asked if Aguirre-Moreno had ever been arrested or convicted of a crime. He answered yes,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.