Arrellano v. City of Culver City

89 F.3d 844 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark A. ARRELLANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF CULVER CITY, a Municipal corporation; Steve Yoshida, individually and as a peace officer; Michael Poulin, individually and as a peace officer; Chris Gutierrez, individually and as a peace officer; Omar Corrales, individually and as a peace officer; Elwin E. (Ted) Cooke, individually and as Chief of Police; Sgt. D. Irvin, individually and as a peace officer; Ofcr. Tankenson individually and as a peace officer; Does 1-50, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55659. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 1996. Decided June 10, 1996. Before: SKOPIL, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Mark Arrellano appeals the district court's judgment, in favor of the City of Culver City and City Police Department employees in Arrellano's action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1985 and state tort law. Arrellano alleged…