Barnard v. Century Enterprises, Inc.

89 F.3d 844 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Earl R. BARNARD; Marguerite S. Barnard, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CENTURY ENTERPRISES, INC.; Vern L. Padgett; FDIC, in its corporate capacity; Joseph N. Barcott, Staff Attorney for FDIC; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35313. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 3, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Earl R. Barnard and Marguerite S. Barnard ("Barnards") appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their action under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b) & 2671-80, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review a district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction de novo, see Winchell v. United States Dep't of Agric., 961 F.2d 1442, 1443 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm. 1 3 The…