Moreno v. Upchurch

89 F.3d 845 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Pete Luis MORENO; Robert Lopez Jaramillo; Lino Flores, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James R. UPCHURCH; Tom Squire, Bill Williams, Investigator Lucas; Sargent Biegenwald; Bill Hinsky; Michael Cabinillas; Joyce McDaniel, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16875. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 3, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona State prisoners Pete Luis Moreno, Robert Lopez Jarmillo, and Lino Flores ("plaintiffs") appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant prison officials in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging that the defendants violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by reading and photocopying their incoming non-legal mail, and delaying its delivery by 10 to 15 days. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Jesinger…