Lindquist v. King County

89 F.3d 845 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randy LINDQUIST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KING COUNTY; James Montgomery, in his capacity as the Sheriff of King County and as an individual; Joe Lewis, in his capacity as a police officer for King County and as an individual; Steve Tucker, in his capacity as a police officer for King County and as an individual, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35621. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randy Lindquist appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor King County, Officers Steve Tucker and Joe Lewis, and Sheriff James Montgomery. Lindquist argues that the search of his residence was unlawful and his constitutional rights were violated. 3 We AFFIRM. 4 Officers Tucker and Lewis are entitled to qualified immunity if, "in light of clearly established principles governing the…