Dugger v. Copeland

89 F.3d 845 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark Richard DUGGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dale E. COPELAND, Warden, Arizona State Prison-Perryville, in his official and individual capacity; Michael Ells, Deputy Warden, Arizona State Prison-Perryville, San Pedro Unit, in his official and individual capacity; Captain Birch, in his official and individual capacity; J.A. Evans, in his official and individual capacity; Judd Jensen, in his official and individual capacity, Patricia Rodriguez, CPO, in her official and individual capacity, and SAM LEWIS, in his official and individual capacity. Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15144. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 7, 1996. * Decided July 9, 1996. 1 Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Mark Dugger appeals pro se the district court's entry of summary judgment in this civil rights action. He contends that prison officials violated his first amendment religious…