Donald Joseph Luebbers v. K.G. Walker T. O'Day

Good Law
89 F.3d 845·1996 WL 225995·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34905
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 3, 199695-16180California648 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 845 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald Joseph LUEBBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K.G. WALKER; T. O'Day, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16180. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 3, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald J. Luebbers appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Luebbers contends that he was denied due process in a prison disciplinary hearing because he was not permitted to call all of the witnesses he requested, and because his request for documents regarding his work record was denied. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 1261 (1996), and affirm. 3 Luebbers contends that he was denied due process because he was only permitted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.