Mark Aston McAdoo v. United States Parole Commission Wayne H. Seifert, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center, Los Angeles

89 F.3d 845 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark Aston McADOO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Wayne H. Seifert, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center, Los Angeles, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-56377. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Mark McAdoo appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition alleging that the United States Parole Commission ("Commission") denied him due process at a parole revocation hearing in which his mandatory release was revoked and he was ordered to remain in custody for ten months. Specifically, petitioner contends that the Commission acted outside its authority by relying on certain parole violations that the Commission had previously considered during an earlier parole modification. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to…