Key

Key v. Oakland Housing Authority

Good Law
89 F.3d 845
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 3, 1996845California863 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 845 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walter Raymond KEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY; Local 1877 Service Employees International Union; State Compensation Insurance Fund, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15164. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 3, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Walter Raymond Key appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Service Employees International Union Local 1877 ("Union") and dismissing his claims against the Oakland Housing Authority ("Authority") and the State Compensation Insurance Fund ("Fund") in Key's action alleging that: (1) the Authority improperly terminated him in 1977, (2) the Fund denied him a fair hearing, and (3) the Union denied his request for assistance in violation of its duty of fair representation. Key alleged employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.