Hamadi Jamali Fatiha Jamali v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

89 F.3d 845 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Hamadi JAMALI; Fatiha Jamali, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70844. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 12, 1996. * Decided June 10, 1996. 1 Before: BROWNING and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, ** Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Hamadi Jamali and his wife Fatiha 1 petition for review of a BIA decision dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge's denial of their requests for asylum and withholding of deportation. We deny the petition, but stay the mandate for 60 days to allow Jamali to move to reopen the proceedings and file an application for suspension of deportation with the Board or District Director. Jamali appears to have an especially strong case for suspension of deportation because of the health condition and medical needs of his minor child, a citizen of the United States. 4 For the reasons stated by the Board, we…