Litmon v. Allenbaugh

89 F.3d 845 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David LITMON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Una ALLENBAUGH, trust officer in prisoner accounts CSP Solano; Davis, Mr.; C/O Blackwell; C/O Vasquez; T Van Gelder; C/O Thomas; C/O Negrete, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17302. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Litmon, Jr., a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of state prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Litmon contends that prison officials denied him access to the courts by interfering with his possession of his legal materials and by denying him access to his prison trust account in retaliation for his failure to cooperate in the disposal of his excess legal material. He also contends that his property was confiscated without due process in violation of the…