Stanley Runion v. Tana Wood, Superintendent John Lambert Donald Holevinski

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stanley RUNION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent; John Lambert; Donald Holevinski, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35322. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stanley Runion, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his right to due process by denying Runion's application to have his friend Marshall Radley reinstated on his visitation list and by failing to provide written notice of that decision. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). See Gotcher v. Wood, 66 F.3d 1097, 1099 (9th Cir.1995), petition for cert. filed, 64…