Richard D. Sandberg Alberta M. Sandberg v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, a Corporation and Does 1 to 50, Inclusive

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard D. SANDBERG; Alberta M. Sandberg, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation; and Does 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56505. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1996. Decided June 10, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and TRIMBLE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Richard and Alberta Sandberg ("Sandbergs") appeal from the district court's dismissal of their complaint against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company ("State Farm") arguing that the district court erred by holding that their claims were barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm. 4 The Sandbergs filed a complaint against State Farm in 1994, alleging, inter alia, breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith, and fraud arising out of State Farm's denial of their insurance claim in 1987. Under California law, a…