Rainey K. Roelen v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

89 F.3d 846 8 NDLR P 202 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rainey K. ROELEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-35438. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 11, 1996. * Decided June 27, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff-Appellant Rainey K. Roelen ("Roelen") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Union Pacific Railroad Co. ("Union Pacific"). Roelen alleges that Union Pacific discriminated against her in violation of the American with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. DISCUSSION 3 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Jessinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994). The appellate court must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,…