Tristan v. Gomez

Good Law
89 F.3d 846·1996 WL 217918·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34836
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 199695-16992California247 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cornelio Jesus TRISTAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director Department of Corrections; Charles D. Marshall, Warden; Terry Peetz; Jack Reagan; Alex M. Astrga; Mundall; R. Peterson; L. Martin/Martinex and V. Bluestein, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16992. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Cornelio Jesus Tristan, a California state prisoner housed at Pelican Bay State Prison, appeals pro se the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous and the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the dismissal. He contends that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment when they failed to treat his eye condition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm for the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.