Ross v. C & C Intern. Yachts Ltd.

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stanley ROSS; Mary L.V. Ross, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. C & C INTERNATIONAL YACHTS LIMITED, a/k/a C & C International Yachts, Ltd.; C & C International Yachts, all doing business under their own names and/or under the following names: C & C Industries Limited a/k/a C & C Industries, Ltd., C & C Industries, C & C Yachts Limited a/k/a C & C Yachts Ltd., C & C Yachts; Rob Turner; Anthony Koo; Frank Chao, individually and in his capacity as Chair of the "Hong Kong Investor Group" which purchased the assets of C & C Yachts, and all other members of the "Hong Kong Investor Group", and the Hong Kong Investor Group, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55958. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1996. Decided June 25, 1996. Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 A civil plaintiff is allowed one, automatic, amendment to…